Nothing official yet, but Bee management is considering coming to The Guild with a proposal to avert furloughs through another option.
“We have to do something,” said Bee HR chief Linda Brooks during an informational meeting on Wednesday. They will come to us when a plan is ready, Brooks said.
One option being considered is a mandatory vacation burn down, which was proposed in Modesto.
Unlike the reduced cap, which was approved by Guild members a few months back, a vacation burn down compels employees to use vacation to get the financial exposure off the balance sheets.
The reduced cap didn’t require that people take vacation time, but stops people from earning more vacation when they reach the new cap.
The problem with furloughs, as Brooks explained, is two-fold.
First, by state law managers and senior writers would have to take a solid week off and the company could not make any contact with them during that period.
Second, and more troubling I would suggest, is that when people are forced to take furloughs, they stop taking their regular vacation. In that case, the company doesn’t get the savings they expected since vacation hoarding means increased liability.
The problem with the Modesto agreement is that the company would not agree to use the vacation burn in lieu of furloughs.
In effect, the company could require them to burn their vacation in July then furlough them in August.
I made it clear we would accept no such deal. In my book it’s one or the other. In no way should we allow them to do both.
Ed Fletcher, Sacramento unit chair